Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 15:30 +0100, I wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 13:09 +0000, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> 
> > > My vote is that we should not have a GUC for such an unlikely event, and that
> > > stopping recovery is good enough.
> > OK. IIUC, my current patch for this fix doesn't need to be changed or withdrawn.
> > Thank you for your explanation.
> 
> Well, that's just my opinion.
> 
> Fujii Masao seemed to disagree with the patch, and his voice carries weight.

I think you should pst another patch where the second, now superfluous,
error message is removed.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe