Re: Race condition in TransactionIdIsInProgress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 12/02/2022 05:42, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-11 16:41:24 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> FWIW, I've indeed reproduced this fairly easily with such a setup. A pgbench
>> r/w workload that's been modified to start 70 savepoints at the start shows
>>
>> pgbench: error: client 22 script 0 aborted in command 12 query 0: ERROR:  t_xmin 3853739 is uncommitted in tuple
(2,159)to be updated in table "pgbench_branches"
 
>> pgbench: error: client 13 script 0 aborted in command 12 query 0: ERROR:  t_xmin 3954305 is uncommitted in tuple
(2,58)to be updated in table "pgbench_branches"
 
>> pgbench: error: client 7 script 0 aborted in command 12 query 0: ERROR:  t_xmin 4017908 is uncommitted in tuple
(3,44)to be updated in table "pgbench_branches"
 
>>
>> after a few minutes of running with a local, not slowed down, syncrep. Without
>> any other artifical slowdowns or such.
> 
> And this can easily be triggered even without subtransactions, in a completely
> reliable way.
> 
> The only reason I'm so far not succeeding in turning it into an
> isolationtester spec is that a transaction waiting for SyncRep doesn't count
> as waiting for isolationtester.
> 
> Basically
> 
> S1: BEGIN; $xid = txid_current(); UPDATE; COMMIT; <commit wait for syncrep>
> S2: SELECT pg_xact_status($xid);
> S2: UPDATE;
> 
> suffices, because the pg_xact_status() causes an xlog fetch, priming the xid
> cache, which then causes the TransactionIdIsInProgress() to take the early
> return path, despite the transaction still being in progress. Which then
> allows the update to proceed, despite the S1 not having "properly committed"
> yet.

I started to improve isolationtester, to allow the spec file to specify 
a custom query to check for whether the backend is blocked. But then I 
realized that it's not quite enough: there is currently no way write the 
   "$xid = txid_current()" step either. Isolationtester doesn't have 
variables like that. Also, you need to set synchronous_standby_names to 
make it block, which seems a bit weird in an isolation test.

I wish we had an explicit way to inject delays or failures. We discussed 
it before 
(https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CANXE4TdxdESX1jKw48xet-5GvBFVSq%3D4cgNeioTQff372KO45A%40mail.gmail.com), 
but I don't want to pick up that task right now.

Anyway, I wrote a TAP test for this instead. See attached. I'm not sure 
if this is worth committing, the pg_xact_status() trick is quite special 
for this particular bug.

Simon's just_remove_TransactionIdIsKnownCompleted_call.v1.patch looks 
good to me. Replying to the discussion on that:

On 12/02/2022 23:50, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-12 13:25:58 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I'm not sure it is possible to remove TransactionIdIsKnownCompleted()
>> in backbranches.
> 
> I think it'd be fine if we needed to. Or we could just make it always return
> false or such.
> 
> 
>>>> just removes the known offending call, passes make check, but IMHO
>>>> leaves the same error just as likely by other callers.
>>>
>>> Which other callers are you referring to?
>>
>> I don't know of any, but we can't just remove a function in a
>> backbranch, can we?
> 
> We have in the past, if it's a "sufficiently internal" function.

I think we should remove it in v15, and leave it as it is in 
backbranches. Just add a comment to point out that the name is a bit 
misleading, because it checks the clog rather than the proc array.  It's 
not inherently dangerous, and someone might have a legit use case for 
it. True, someone might also be doing this incorrect thing with it, but 
still seems like the right balance to me.

I think we also need to change pg_xact_status(), to also call 
TransactionIdIsInProgress() before TransactionIdDidCommit/Abort(). 
Currently, if it returns "committed", and you start a new transaction, 
the new transaction might not yet see the effects of that "committed" 
transaction. With that, you cannot reproduce the original bug with 
pg_xact_status() though, so there's no point in committing that test then.

In summary, I think we should:
- commit and backpatch Simon's 
just_remove_TransactionIdIsKnownCompleted_call.v1.patch
- fix pg_xact_status() to check TransactionIdIsInProgress()
- in v15, remove TransationIdIsKnownCompleted function altogether

I'll try to get around to that in the next few days, unless someone 
beats me to it.

- Heikki