On 4/19/06, Kynn Jones <kynnjo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I keep bumping against this situation: I have a main database A, and I want
> to implement a database B, that is distinct from A, but subordinate to it,
> meaning that it refers to data in A, but not vice versa.
>
> I don't simply want to add new tables to A to implement B, because this
> unnecessarily clutters A's schema with tables that entirely extraneous to
> it.
Hmm. Postgres supports table inheritance, but I don't think it
supports schema or database inheritance in the way you want it to.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/tutorial-inheritance.htmlhttp://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/ddl-inherit.html
--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/
