On 7/30/21 7:33 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Yes, but as I said twice only if the currently installed version is
> different
> from the default version. Otherwise ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE is a no-op.
>
>
> Ah, ok, got it, thanks. Well I'm not sure how to deal with this.
> The only thing I can think of is that we add a post_upgrade function to
> the API.
>
> All extensions would have to implement this.
An alternative to this would be a recommended version number scheme for
extensions. If extensions were numbered
MAJOR_SERVER.MAJOR_EXTENSION.MINOR_EXTENSION
then pg_upgrade could check the new cluster for the existence of an SQL
script that upgrades the extension from the old cluster's version to the
new current. And since an extension cannot have the same version number
on two major server versions, there is no ambiguity here.
The downside is that all the extensions that don't need anything done
for those upgrades (which I believe is the majority of them) would have
to provide empty SQL files. Not necessarily a bad thing, as it actually
documents "yes, the extension developer checked this and there is
nothing to do here."
Regards, Jan
--
Jan Wieck
