Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tushar
Subject Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id 3aabfdf7-aa21-7658-d535-72a65948277f@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/7/20 2:27 PM, 曾文旌 wrote:
> Vacuum full GTT, cluster GTT is already 
> supported in global_temporary_table_v24-pg13.patch.
Please refer this below scenario , where pg_upgrade is failing
1)Server is up and running (./pg_ctl -D data status)
2)Stop the server ( ./pg_ctl -D data stop)
3)Connect to server using single user mode ( ./postgres --single -D data 
postgres) and create a global temp table
[tushar@localhost bin]$ ./postgres --single -D data1233 postgres

PostgreSQL stand-alone backend 13devel
backend> create global temp table t(n int);

--Press Ctl+D to exit

4)Perform initdb ( ./initdb -D data123)
5.Run pg_upgrade
[tushar@localhost bin]$ ./pg_upgrade -d data -D data123 -b . -B .
--
--
--
Restoring database schemas in the new cluster
   postgres
*failure*
Consult the last few lines of "pg_upgrade_dump_13592.log" for
the probable cause of the failure.
Failure, exiting

log file content  -

[tushar@localhost bin]$ tail -20   pg_upgrade_dump_13592.log
pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR:  pg_type array OID 
value not set when in binary upgrade mode
Command was:
-- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_type oid
SELECT 
pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_pg_type_oid('13594'::pg_catalog.oid);


-- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids
SELECT 
pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_heap_pg_class_oid('13593'::pg_catalog.oid);

CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE "public"."t" (
     "n" integer
)
WITH ("on_commit_delete_rows"='false');

-- For binary upgrade, set heap's relfrozenxid and relminmxid
UPDATE pg_catalog.pg_class
SET relfrozenxid = '0', relminmxid = '0'
WHERE oid = '"public"."t"'::pg_catalog.regclass;

-- 
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB  https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)