Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>>
>>>why not do both, but deprecate the use of all in the docs? say with an
>>>eventual goal of removing the use of all altogether in 2 releases?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>The extra value is fairly low IMNSHO if we can distinguish between a
>>magical and a non-magical 'all' - see the patch I just submitted.
>>
>>
>
>Also, your point about the special sameuser and samegroup keywords is a
>good one. We should make those all work consistently (ie, quoting makes
>it not a keyword). Going in the "*" direction would only make sense
>if that were the only special case --- but it isn't. I don't think we
>want to start choosing random symbols for sameuser, samegroup, and other
>stuff we might think of in future.
>
>
>
Right. Revised patch sent to patches list.
cheers
andrew
