Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Olivier Hubaut
Subject Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?
Date
Msg-id 3FD6ECC3.6070403@scmbb.ulb.ac.be
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Kris Jurka wrote:

>
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Olivier Hubaut wrote:
>
>
>>I'm trying to do a create function using JDBC 3,0 in Eclipse IDE with
>>JFaceDBC plugin.
>
>
> I don't know the JFaceDBC plugin does, but it seems like the @user_schema@
> and what not indicate a replacement scheme.  Is it possible that it also
> alters the function body somehow?
>
> I don't think this is a backend or JDBC problem.  If you think otherwise a
> more complete example that can be run without Eclipse will be necessary.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
>
>
Thanks for your fast response.

The @user_schema@ and other similar pattern are just ANT's variables
used to create the functions on demand. The real query contains the réal
schema name and function name, and this one doesn't work.

I've already tried to make some other multiple queries, without any
problems. There is only with the CREATE FUNCTION that this bug appear.

I don't Think JFaceDBC is the cause, it's only a quite simple editor to
write queries with colorization, noting else.

--
Ci-git une signature avortee.
** RIP **

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?
Next
From: "Alexey Yudichev"
Date:
Subject: OID, compatible=7.1 and getBinaryStream() in 7.4 driver + 7.4 database