Re: COMMENT ON mega patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: COMMENT ON mega patch
Date
Msg-id 3FBED09D.9090102@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COMMENT ON mega patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: COMMENT ON mega patch
List pgsql-patches
> * You were using a bare C string as the amname argument in COMMENT ON
> OPERATOR CLASS.  This won't do because the parse tree is not a valid
> Node structure; copyObject will fail on it.  I inserted makeString()
> and strVal() calls to fix it.
>
> BTW, a simple test to detect uncopiable-parsetree problems is to compile
> with COPY_PARSE_PLAN_TREES defined.  Doing so revealed that you're not
> the only person to have made this mistake lately --- ALTER SEQUENCE is
> broken too.

Ok.

> * I made the macros LARGE and OBJECT be LARGE_P and OBJECT_P; they
> seemed just a little too ripe for conflicts as-is ...
 >
> * The pg_dump code for COMMENT ON OPCLASS pretty obviously had not been
> tested :-(

Hrm.  Yeah, weird.  I think I just forgot, because I learned in this
patch that you can't do two of those %s in the append function, and I
had fixed it in all the other dumps. *sigh*

The other thing I was concerned about was a bit of code duplication,
especially for the comment on opclass function.

Out of interest, I notice you didn't commit my inv_api.c change to
delete comments on LOBs - where did you put it instead?

Chris



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Craig Boston
Date:
Subject: PATCH: Uninitialized variable usage in contrib/pg_autovacuum
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON mega patch