Re: cvs head? initdb? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: cvs head? initdb?
Date
Msg-id 3FB7AB8C.9080101@Yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cvs head? initdb?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: cvs head? initdb?
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat wrote:
> 
> but how do you test this if you cant run them both against each other to 
> compare?  (initally running vs 7.4 does tell you something, but even now, 7.5 
> improved cross datatype index improvments could skew the results of any 
> comparisons)

Right. But with the current two candidates (LRU and ARC) in the field 
only, there isn't much to compare. If someone wants to implement another 
algorithm, I will be happy to put the required switchboard (something 
like the jump table in smgr) into the code. Right now I see much more 
bang for the buck in creating the background writer.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: cvs head? initdb?
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS