>still, might be best to avoid that whole end of it if we can... the only
>database i think it stacks up against is mysql, maybe firebird, and spadb.
>your just not going to convince anyone they should go with postgresql due to
>mutliple support options and the oft chance that oracle/ibm/m$ might go
>under...
>
>
No but you might convince them stating that there is reliable company
level support for PostgreSQL.
I guess my point is, if you word it correctly it sounds (and is)
representative of a solid support
infrastructure which is a common misconception about Open Source... that
there isn't one.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
>although... what is the db that ibm recently dropped support for?
>
>Robert Treat
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
