Re: initdb in C - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: initdb in C
Date
Msg-id 3FACAB61.5040305@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb in C  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] initdb in C  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>
>
>>It passes all the regression tests.  I have also included a diff against
>>Andrew's version so you can see my changes.  It seems Andrew had a very
>>current version of initdb.  The only update he missed was the change to
>>test the number of connections before shared buffers --- I made that
>>change myself.
>>
>>
>
>I had some concern about whether Andrew's rewrite had tracked all the
>recent changes to the initdb shell-script sources.  Are you both
>confident that it is up to date?
>
>
>

Yes. Bruce has picked up the one change I didn't track (revision 1.204).


cheers

andrew


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb in C
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb in C