Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
>> My plan is to create another background process very similar to
>> the checkpointer and to let that run forever basically looping over that
>> BufferSync() with a bool telling that it's the bg_writer.
>
> Why not use the checkpointer itself inbetween checkpoints ?
> use a min and a max dirty setting like Informix. Start writing
> when more than max are dirty stop when at min. This avoids writing
> single pages (which is slow, since it cannot be grouped together
> by the OS).
Current approach is similar ... if I strech the IO and syncing over the
entire 150-300 second checkpoint interval, grouping in 50 pages then
sync()+nap, the system purr's pretty nice and without any peaks.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
