Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache
Date
Msg-id 3F87E8DF.5080608@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache  ("Chris Faulkner" <chrisf@oramap.com>)
List pgsql-performance
>  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..147.11 rows=1 width=148) (actual
> time=84.00..12323.00 rows=67 loops=1)

The planner estimate doesn't seem to match reality in that particular
step.  Are you sure you've run:

ANALYZE oscar_node;
ANALYZE oscar_point;

And you could even run VACUUM FULL on them just to make sure.

Does that make any difference?

Chris



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Chris Faulkner"
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache