Re: State of Beta 2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: State of Beta 2
Date
Msg-id 3F661663.6060206@pari.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of Beta 2  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: State of Beta 2  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Sure but IMHO it would be more important to fix bugs like the parser not
> correctly using indexes on bigint unless the value is quoted...

> I think everyone would agree that not having to use initdb would be nice
> but I think there is much more important things to focus on.

Important is relative.

> Besides if you are upgrading PostgreSQL in a production environment I
> would assume there would be an extremely valid reason. If the reason is
> big enough to do a major version upgrade then an initdb shouldn't be all
> that bad of a requirement.

I'm not going to rehash the arguments I have made before; they are all
archived.  Suffice to say you are simply wrong.  The number of
complaints over the years shows that there IS a need.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of
Next
From: Andrew Rawnsley
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2