Re: State of Beta 2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: State of Beta 2
Date
Msg-id 3F661FA6.4020109@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of Beta 2  (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>)
Responses Re: State of Beta 2  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Re: State of Beta 2  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
List pgsql-general
> I'm not going to rehash the arguments I have made before; they are all
> archived.  Suffice to say you are simply wrong.  The number of
> complaints over the years shows that there IS a need.


I at no point suggested that there was not a need. I only suggest that
the need may not be as great as some suspect or feel. To be honest -- if
your arguments were the "need" that everyone had... it would have been
implemented some how. It hasn't yet which would suggest that the number
of people that have the "need" at your level is not as great as the
number of people who have different "needs" from PostgreSQL.

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake




--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Rawnsley
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Next
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: need for in-place upgrades