Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of
Date
Msg-id 3F661590.5090701@pari.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> It is alot but is is not a lot for something like an Insurance company
> or a bank. Also 100TB is probably non-compressed although 30TB is still
> large.

Our requirements are such that this figure is our best guess after
compression.  The amount of data prior to compression is much larger,
and consists of highly compressible astronomical observations in FITS
format.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Holger Marzen
Date:
Subject: Re: Space
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2