Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of
Date
Msg-id 3F65F6EF.8060205@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of  (Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>)
Responses Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of
List pgsql-general
>
> 100TB sounds like a lot of backup media and time... Not to mention
> ensuring that the backups will work with available and functioning
> backup hardware.

It is alot but is is not a lot for something like an Insurance company
or a bank. Also 100TB is probably non-compressed although 30TB is still
large.


>
> Head hurts just to think about it,
>
> Link.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of Beta 2)
Next
From: Abdul-Wahid Paterson
Date:
Subject: after postgres upgrade - ERROR: current transaction is aborted