Re: ext3 block size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From DeJuan Jackson
Subject Re: ext3 block size
Date
Msg-id 3F32800C.2040101@speedfc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ext3 block size  (Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>)
List pgsql-general
It was RH8 where I saw the issues.  It was so bad that I had one server
freeze 20 minutes after reboot. And it wasn't a hardware issue; that
server is now running with several months of uptime under heavy load.

Jonathan Bartlett wrote:

>What distribution are you running?  I and a lot of other people use RH8 on
>multiprocesor boxes, and it works great!
>
>Jon
>
>On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, DeJuan Jackson wrote:
>
>
>
>>Don't know the answer to your question, but I thought I would just pipe
>>in and say that if this is an SMP (has multiple processors) Linux box
>>you don't want to use ext3!!!
>>
>>I used ext3 on my SMP box here at work and now I can't have children (I
>>guess it would help if I got a wife first)!!
>>But in all seriousness SMP + ext3 = BAD(unpredictable crashes depending
>>loosely related to system load).
>>
>>
>>Wilson A. Galafassi Jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>hello.
>>>my database size is 5GB. what is the block size recommend?
>>>thanks
>>>wilson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Call to undefined function: pg_connect()
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: Tsearch2 custom dictionaries