Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Rajesh Kumar Mallah |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect |
Date | |
Msg-id | 3F26A503.3050104@trade-india.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect to a function ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Why performance improvement on converting subselect to a function ?
|
List | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
Sorry for the delayed response.
branding_master_old_comapany_id btree (old_company_id),
regds , mallah.
Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com> writes:explain analyze SELECT company_id , (SELECT edition FROM ONLY public.branding_master b WHERE old_company_id = a.company_id OR company_id = a.company_id ORDER BY b.company_id DESC LIMIT 1) from public.branding_master a limit 50; Total runtime: 19429.76 msecCREATE FUNCTION most_recent_edition (integer) returns integer AS 'SELECT edition::integer FROM ONLY public.branding_master b WHERE old_company_id = $1 OR company_id = $1 ORDER BY b.company_id DESC LIMIT 1 ' language 'sql';tradein_clients=# explain analyze SELECT company_id , most_recent_edition(company_id) from public.branding_master limit 50; Total runtime: 3969.52 msecOdd. Apparently the planner is picking a better plan in the function context than in the subselect context --- which is strange since it ought to have less information. AFAIK the only way to see the plan generated for a SQL function's query is like this: regression=# create function foo(int) returns int as regression-# 'select unique1 from tenk1 where unique1 = $1' language sql; CREATE FUNCTION regression=# set debug_print_plan TO 1; SET regression=# set client_min_messages TO debug; SET regression=# select foo(55); DEBUG: plan: DETAIL: {RESULT :startup_cost 0.00 :total_cost 0.01 :plan_rows 1 :plan_width 0 :targetlist ({TARGETENTRY :resdom {RESDOM :resno 1 :restype 23 :restypmod -1 :resname foo :ressortgroupref 0 :resorigtbl 0 :resorigcol 0 :resjunk false} :expr {FUNCEXPR :funcid 706101 :funcresulttype 23 :funcretset false... (etc etc) Would you do that and send it along? I'm curious ...
Sorry for the delayed response.
tradein_clients=# explain analyze SELECT company_id , data_bank.most_recent_edition(company_id) from public.branding_master limit 50;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..3.57 rows=50 width=4) (actual time=149.52..2179.49 rows=50 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on branding_master (cost=0.00..6626.52 rows=92752 width=4) (actual time=149.51..2179.30 rows=51 loops=1)
tradein_clients=#
tradein_clients=#
tradein_clients=# explain analyze SELECT company_id , data_bank.most_recent_edition(company_id) from public.branding_master limit 50;
DEBUG: StartTransactionCommand
LOG: plan:
{ LIMIT :startup_cost 0.00 :total_cost 185.65 :rows 1 :width 6 :qptargetlist
({ TARGETENTRY :resdom { RESDOM :resno 1 :restype 23 :restypmod -1 :resname
edition :reskey 0 :reskeyop 0 :ressortgroupref 0 :resjunk false } :expr { EXPR
:typeOid 23 :opType func :oper { FUNC :funcid 313 :funcresulttype 23
:funcretset false :funcformat 1 } :args ({ VAR :varno 1 :varattno 31 :vartype
21 :vartypmod -1 :varlevelsup 0 :varnoold 1 :varoattno 31})}} { TARGETENTRY
:resdom { RESDOM :resno 2 :restype 23 :restypmod -1 :resname company_id
:reskey 0 :reskeyop 0 :ressortgroupref 1 :resjunk true } :expr { VAR :varno 1
:varattno 1 :vartype 23 :vartypmod -1 :varlevelsup 0 :varnoold 1 :varoattno
1}}) :qpqual <> :lefttree { INDEXSCAN :startup_cost 0.00 :total_cost 24302.69
:rows 131 :width 6 :qptargetlist ({ TARGETENTRY :resdom { RESDOM :resno 1
:restype 23 :restypmod -1 :resname edition :reskey 0 :reskeyop 0
:ressortgroupref 0 :resjunk false } :expr { EXPR :typeOid 23 :opType func
:oper { FUNC :funcid 313 :funcresulttype 23 :funcretset false :funcformat 1 }
:args ({ VAR :varno 1 :varattno 31 :vartype 21 :vartypmod -1 :varlevelsup 0
:varnoold 1 :varoattno 31})}} { TARGETENTRY :resdom { RESDOM :resno 2 :restype
23 :restypmod -1 :resname company_id :reskey 0 :reskeyop 0 :ressortgroupref 1
:resjunk true } :expr { VAR :varno 1 :varattno 1 :vartype 23 :vartypmod -1
:varlevelsup 0 :varnoold 1 :varoattno 1}}) :qpqual ({ EXPR :typeOid 16
:opType or :oper <> :args ({ EXPR :typeOid 16 :opType op :oper { OPER :opno
96 :opid 65 :opresulttype 16 :opretset false } :args ({ VAR :varno 1 :varattno
19 :vartype 23 :vartypmod -1 :varlevelsup 0 :varnoold 1 :varoattno 19} {
PARAM :paramkind 12 :paramid 1 :paramname \<unnamed> :paramtype 23 })} { EXPR
:typeOid 16 :opType op :oper { OPER :opno 96 :opid 65 :opresulttype 16
:opretset false } :args ({ VAR :varno 1 :varattno 1 :vartype 23 :vartypmod -1
:varlevelsup 0 :varnoold 1 :varoattno 1} { PARAM :paramkind 12 :paramid 1
:paramname \<unnamed> :paramtype 23 })})}) :lefttree <> :righttree <> :extprm
() :locprm () :initplan <> :nprm 0 :scanrelid 1 :indxid ( 310742439)
:indxqual (<>) :indxqualorig (<>) :indxorderdir -1 } :righttree <> :extprm ()
:locprm () :initplan <> :nprm 0 :limitOffset <> :limitCount { CONST
:consttype 23 :constlen 4 :constbyval true :constisnull false :constvalue 4 [
1 0 0 0 ] }}
DEBUG: CommitTransactionCommand
But i feel it can be lot more faster , can anyone suggest me something to try.
Its there already..Create an index on old_company_id, perhaps.
branding_master_old_comapany_id btree (old_company_id),
regds , mallah.
regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
pgsql-performance by date: