On Aug 20, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you would to ignore result, then you should to use a PERFORM - actually, it is limited now and should be fixed.
Haveno problem with it.
Glad to have you on board. :-)
> I don't would to enable a free unbound statement that returns result.
I have no pony in that race. I think it is useful, though I prefer to unit test things enough that I would be fine
withoutit.
But even without it, there may be times when I want to discard a result in a function that *does* return a value --
likelya different value. So there needs to be a way to distinguish statements that should return a value and those that
donot.
Best,
David
