Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> However, my question is: Is there a way to implement it in a way that
> does not depend on the remote data structure?
> Is there a way to get rid of the AS without having to define a type?
Unfortunately, no. The parse and planning stages need defined types, so
waiting for the function to execute is too late. We've discussed it a
time or two before (as recently as within the last week), but the
conclusion has been that there is no easy answer to the problem.
Joe
