Re: Problem trying to implement version 3.0 of the PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Carlos Guzman Alvarez
Subject Re: Problem trying to implement version 3.0 of the PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 3EDE6942.3020500@telefonica.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem trying to implement version 3.0 of the PostgreSQL protocol  (Carlos Guzman Alvarez <carlosga@telefonica.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello:

> Your Parse message looks fine, but the server will not actually send its
> ParseComplete response until you send a Sync or Flush message.  The idea
> is that Parse is usually going to be part of a series of operations, and
> you don't want a separate network packet coming back for each operation
> in the series.  When you do want to see the results of an operation
> before you issue the next one, you can issue either Flush (just forces
> out the pending messages) or Sync (which does all the stuff that was
> formerly done at the end of a Query message).
> 
> Error messages do get flushed out immediately, which is why you were
> able to see the response in the other case.

Thanks very much it's working well now :D





-- 
Best regards

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain

"No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso"
Albert Einstein, científico.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO list