Re: JDBC 3.0 support? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Barry Lind
Subject Re: JDBC 3.0 support?
Date
Msg-id 3EB873CE.9080605@xythos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JDBC 3.0 support?  (Hanasaki JiJi <hanasaki@hanaden.com>)
Responses Re: JDBC 3.0 support?  (Hanasaki JiJi <hanasaki@hanaden.com>)
Re: JDBC 3.0 support?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Hanasaki,

The driver is already 3.0 compliant for that.  It correctly returns
false to DatabaseMetaData.supportsGetGeneratedKeys() indicating that
postgresql does not support this functionality.  This isn't likely to
change unless some significant new functionality is introduced in the
server to do this.  There isn't really anything the driver can do here
since the functionality doesn't exist in the database to automatically
return this information.

thanks,
--Barry


Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> primarily - ResultSet resultSet = statement.getGeneratedKeys();
>
> Barry Lind wrote:
>
>> The driver does support jdbc3.0.  However that support is not 100%
>> complete (but then neither is the jdbc2 nor jdbc1 support 100%
>> either).  So the real question is what isn't there that you are
>> looking for?
>>
>> thanks,
>> --Barry
>>
>> Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
>>
>>> any target date for a JDBC3.0 compliant driver?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Hanasaki JiJi
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC 3.0 support?
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: Memroy leak with jdbc