I suspect the '-fast' introduced arithmetic associativity transformations that horology is sensitive to. I've seen
thisin the past.
The solution I used was to mod the Makefile to exclude the sensitive routines from the aggressive optimizations. As I
recall,adt.c was the prime culprit.
- Luke
Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:bruce@momjian.us]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 11:51 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Zdenek Kotala
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tom Lane; Match.Grun@thomson.com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> I tried regression test with Postgres Beta and horology test field. See
> attached log. It appears few month ago - see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2006-06/msg00004.php
> I used Sun Studio 11 with -fast flag and SPARC platform.
Are you looking for ways to contort Solaris to make PostgreSQL fail?
That doesn't prove much about PostgreSQL, but rather about Solaris.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to
majordomo@postgresql.orgso that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
