Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>With ever more larger businesses adopting PostgreSQL, and that leading
>>on to more places having several versions of PostgreSQL in operation
>>simultaneously (i.e. development vs production) we're probably going to
>>need to give psql the ability to handle whichever version of the PG
>>backend it happens to connect to.
>>
>>Marc's suggestion of breaking psql into it's own sub-project makes good
>>sense from that point of view.
Hey, good point. Giving psql the ability to handle multiple backend
versions could be done in a number of ways.
> Subproject or not, why don't we just rearrange psql to dynamically load a
> library of functions, eg:
>
> libpsql72.so
> libpsql73.so
> etc...
>
> And in them you have functions like:
>
> printTableDef();
> printViewDef();
> etc...
Is this very different from how it's done at present?
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> Chris
>
>
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
