I would be more than happy to pay into a paypal or some other account to
cover hosting costs for the www.postgresql.org site. I'm sure many
others would feel the same way.
Cheers,
Gavin
Ewald Geschwinde wrote:
> Ok we vote and that who vote against it are paying the costs
> no problem from that point of view
>
>
> And with that opinion: "other sites don't have banners"
> www.postgresql.org is no other site.
> If we can improve webpages with the income of the ads why not.
> All talk about marketing ... ADS ARE SOME KIND OF MARKETING
>
> It's an honor that someone wants to place ads on a site cause then the
> site is viewed by many people.
>
> regards Ewald
>
>
> Medi Montaseri schrieb:
>
>> I don't like ads....
>>
>> How about a vote....
>>
>> The problem with Ads is who gets to decide what goes....where do we
>> darw the lines,
>> And all that greed vs solution for the sake of solution comes in...
>> The Operating Expenses needs to be solved a different
>> way....including tax deductable
>> contributioins....
>>
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> There were always ads on the mirror page at www.postgresql.org --
>>>> but I
>>>> agree with you that the presence of ads in any form is not ideal. I
>>>> raised the issue on -hackers yesterday, and it's being discussed
>>>> ATM...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Personally, I'm in favor of ads if it is needed to offset the cost
>>> of hosting, and as long as the advertisers are companies which
>>> support Open Source.
>>>
>>> In fact, I was thinking of buying an ad myself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
