>
>
>I am sure, many of you would like to delete this message before reading, hold
>on. :-)
>
I'm afraid most posters did not read the message. Those who replied
"Why bother?" did not address your challenge:
>I think threads are useful in difference situations namely parallelising
>blocking conditions and using multiple CPUs.
>
>
This is indeed one of the few good reasons for threads. Indeed,
large/robust systems use a mix.
The consensus of the group is that those who do the work are not ready
for threads. Which is fine. Looking into my crystal ball, I see that
it will happen, though it appears so far away.
bbaker
