> On 15 Nov 2021, at 09:15, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think this is not an improvement. It loses the ability of the caller the
> specify exactly why a relation is not acceptable.
Agreed.
> I think a separate errdetail_relpersistence_not_supported() would be a better
> solution (assuming there are enough callers to make it worth a separate
> function).
I still think that the v8 patch posted earlier is the better option, which
increase granularity of error reporting with a small code footprint.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/