Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
<snip>
> > Personally I think this is a low-risk patch and so choice 2 is
> > appropriate.
If this is the only change, then 2 does seem like the best mix of
risk/progress.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> Sorry, I was vague. I think we should apply and go to RC1 tomorrow.
> There will always be tweaks and fixes. If we expect it to be perfect,
> we will never make a final release. We are 2.5 months into beta, and
> if we don't want +3 months beta, we should get going.
>
> We have to start taking some _reasonable_ risks to move this forward.
> Until we make a final, we will not increase our test pool, and at this
> point we are all sort of staring at each other. Let's go!
<snip>
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
