Robert Treat wrote:
> I'm not sure of the functionality your looking for, can you point me to
> a definition of "two phased commits"?
>
> Robert Treat
He's probably updating/inserting data on many pgsql servers at once,
two-phase commits are the best-known algorithm to do it safely:
Phase 1: Perform queries on all servers, commit
-- wait for commit confirmation from all servers
Phase 2: If there have not been any errors, perform the "real" commit on
all servers; else perform a rollback and undo changes.
The commit from phase 1 isn't a real commit, although data is written to
disk, etc, the database still waits for the second commit to make the
changes visible.
I don't think there's any way to do it in Pgsql. Once you committed the
data the first time, the only way to undo the changes is to send a batch
of queries to reverse them.
Cristóvão
>
>
> On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 06:53, Stephen J. Thompson wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >Is it correct that postgresql can not support two phase commits? If
> not is
> >there any plans to do so? We are doing a large amount of development
> on EJB
> >servers and need to perform two phase commits between the database
> server and
> >the mom server.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Stephen.
