Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id 3D920BD6.F4DE033F@Yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
List pgsql-hackers
"scott.marlowe" wrote:

> Having a FILE called pg_xlog isn't the fix here, it's the result of the
> fix, which is to take all the steps of moving the pg_xlog directory and
> put them into one script file the user doesn't need to understand to do it
> right.  I.e. idiot proof the system as much as possible.

And your script/program cannot modify postgresql.conf instead of
creating a new file?

Please remember: "A fool with a tool is still a fool". You can
provide programs and scripts as many as you want. There have
allways been these idiots who did stuff like truncating pg_log
...


Jan

-- 

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being
right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive
me.                                  #
#==================================================
JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?