Re: [PATCHES] Chinese GB18030 support is implemented! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bill Huang
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Chinese GB18030 support is implemented!
Date
Msg-id 3D086217.6020201@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Chinese GB18030 support is implemented!  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Chinese GB18030 support is implemented!
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Ishii-san,

Great!Thanks for your help.
Would you please update the  Makefile under Unicode?it should be updated 
for GB18030.

Best regards,
Bill


Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

>[pgsql-announce removed and pgsql-hackers added]
>
>I have applied your patches with small corrections. Please grab the
>latest source and let me know if something is wrong.
>
>Thanks.
>--
>Tatsuo Ishii
>
>>Hi Ishii-san,
>>
>>The patches are attached.Please apply it.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Bill
>>
>>Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>As postgresql is widely used in the world,many Chinese users are looking
>>>>forward to use such a high performanced database management
>>>>system.However since the Chinese new codepage standard GB18030 is not
>>>>completely supported,postgresql is limitted to be used in China.
>>>>
>>>>Now I have managed to implement the GB18030 support upon the latest
>>>>version,so the following functions are added after the patches are added.
>>>>
>>>>-Chinese GB18030 encoding is available on front-end side,while on
>>>>backend side,EUC_CN or MIC is used.
>>>>-Encoding convertion between MIC and GB18030 is implement.
>>>>-GB18030 locale support is available on front-end side.
>>>>-GB18030 locale test is added.
>>>>
>>>>Any help for testing with these patches and sugguestions for GB18030
>>>>support are greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>We need to apply your pacthes to the current source tree(we are not
>>>allowed to add new feature stable source tree). Your pacthes for
>>>encnames.c pg_wchar.h and wchar.c are rejected due to the difference
>>>between 7.2 and current.
>>>
>>>Can you give me patches encnames.c pg_wchar.h and wchar.c against
>>>current?
>>>
>>>Unicode conversion map staffs ISO10646-GB18030.TXT utf8_to_gb18030.map
>>>UCS_to_GB18030.pl and gb18030_to_utf8.map are looks good for
>>>current. So I will apply them.
>>>--
>>>Tatsuo Ishii
>>>
>>-- 
>>/---------------------------/ 
>>(Bill Huang)
>>E-mail:bill_huanghb@ybb.ne.jp
>>Cell phone:090-9979-4631
>>/---------------------------/
>>
-- 
Bill Huang           (81)-3-3257-0417
Red Hat K.K.         http://www.jp.redhat.com





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Integrating libpqxx
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: New string functions; initdb required