Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date
Msg-id 3CBB9D65.EB181BE0@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> > > > Is there any consensus on it ?
> > >
> > > Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems;  see TODO
> > > dependency checking section.
> >
> > Yes I know it's a very siginificant mechanism. It would contibute
> > e.g. to the DROP COLUMN implementation considerably but no one
> > referred to pg_depend in the recent discussion about DROP COLUMN.
> > So I've thought pg_depend is for something else.
>
> Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some
> problems much easier to fix.  I am excited to see it happening!
>
> We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan
> but were just waiting for someone to do the work.

Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
What was the conclusion of the discussion ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts