Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some > > problems much easier to fix. I am excited to see it happening! > > > > We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan > > but were just waiting for someone to do the work. > > Probably I overlooked the conclusion then. > What was the conclusion of the discussion ? Here is one of the threads: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=Pine.NEB.4.21.0107171458030.586-100000%40candlekeep.home-net.internetconnect.net&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dpg_depend%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.*%26hl%3Den%26selm%3DPine.NEB.4.21.0107171458030.586-100000%2540candlekeep.home-net.internetconnect.net%26rnum%3D1 -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
pgsql-patches by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных