Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Igor Kovalenko
Subject Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix
Date
Msg-id 3C990AD1.F81DB829@motorola.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix  ("Robert E. Bruccoleri" <bruc@stone.congenomics.com>)
Responses Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix  ("Robert E. Bruccoleri" <bruc@stone.congenomics.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I am confused to hell. I always thought MIPS does NOT have TAS
instruction ;)

"Robert E. Bruccoleri" wrote:
> 
> Dear Igor,
> 
> Igor Kovalenko writes:
> 
> > Makes me wonder... perhaps now someone will be convinced to take a look
> > at the POSIX IPC patch. On some platforms (not on Linux I am afraid)
> > POSIX mutexes might be quite a bit faster than SYSV semaphores.
> 
> Yes, but on the SGI platform, the MIPS test_and_set instructions are
> really fast and should be used.
> 
> +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+
> | Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | email: bruc@acm.org                |
> | P.O. Box 314                | URL:   http://www.congen.com/~bruc |
> | Pennington, NJ 08534        |                                    |
> +-----------------------------+------------------------------------+


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Robert E. Bruccoleri"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix
Next
From: "Robert E. Bruccoleri"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix