Re: timestamp_part() bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: timestamp_part() bug?
Date
Msg-id 3C921F03.65920CE0@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timestamp_part() bug?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> There is a problem with epoch as well that was not in the 7.1.3
> 7.1.3# select extract(epoch from '00:00:34'::time), now();
> 7.1.3# 34  2002-03-05 22:13:16 +01
> Is that a bug or I didn't understand the new date/time types ?

Looks like a bug (or at least it looks like it behaves differently than
I would expect). Thanks for the report; I'll look at it asap.
                  - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: psql and output from \?