PG 7.2b4 bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject PG 7.2b4 bug?
Date
Msg-id 3C1E4BDC.60404@pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: PG 7.2b4 bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PG 7.2b4 bug?  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Apparently there's been a change in the way views are handled within 
PostreSQL.  The following program works fine in earlier versions.  It 
also works if the select on the view is replaced with a direct call to 
nextval().

We use this construct repeatedly in OpenACS so we can share queries that 
use sequences between Oracle and PostgreSQL unless they differ in other 
ways that can't be reconciled between the two RDBMS's.  Obviously, the 
greater the number of queries we can share in this way, the lower our 
porting, new code development, and code maintenance costs.

As it stands neither the older OpenACS 3.x toolkit nor the upcoming 
OpenACS 4.x toolkit will work with PG 7.2.

Ouch.

Sorry for the long delay in reporting this.  I only recently decided to 
get off my rear end and test against PG 7.2 after Marc Fournier tried to 
do an install and ran into a few problems.

Here's some code.  The problem's caused by the fact that two rows are 
being inserted due to the reference to "multiple rows".  Sequential 
inserts of single rows using the view work just fine:

create sequence test_seq_x;

create view test_seq as  select nextval('test_seq_x') as nextval;

create table data (i integer primary key);

create table multiple_rows (i integer);

insert into multiple_rows values (1);
insert into multiple_rows values (2);

insert into data
select test_seq.nextval
from multiple_rows;

-- 
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Potential bug in pg_dump ...
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: recursive SQL functions