Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?
Date
Msg-id 3BD75E18.E971F0A3@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?  ("Dominic J. Eidson" <sauron@the-infinite.org>)
List pgsql-general
> > In fact, some could argue that the default behavior of PostgreSQL
> > should be changed (or at least have an option) to behave like
> > Oracle, where a transaction is implicitly begun at the first
> > encounter of an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE - or in PostgreSQL's case, the
> > first submitted statement.
> If we put in an implicit BEGIN at the start of a connection, when
> does it get committed?  We certainly dare not do an implicit COMMIT
> when the client disconnects, but without that the change would
> completely break a lot of existing applications.

Ingres solved this with a mode switch; "set autocommit on|off" which is
in the style that we would likely use too. It *should* be optional, but
settable, and we can debate which should be the default later.

When autocommit is "off", the transaction gets committed when you exit
or when you explicitly commit.

                    - Thomas

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?