Re: Does "postmaster -i"... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Does "postmaster -i"...
Date
Msg-id 3BD069BF.9D5CDF7@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Does "postmaster -i"...  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
...
> All three of these cases work just fine for me.  Maybe some platform
> dependency has snuck in?  Hard to see how though.  It looks like the
> failure is occurring when the postmaster launches the xlog startup
> subprocess.  The building of the argument list for that subprocess is
> fixed and not dependent on what you give to the postmaster (see
> SSDataBase in postmaster.c).

No ideas at all; this stuff has always worked for me (and everyone
else). Let's wait and see if anyone else notices a problem; in the
meantime I have a workaround by giving it more than one argument per one
of the examples.

I *haven't* blown away my tree and done a build from scratch, but istm
that is not something that would magically get things working.

Hmm. I'll try a distclean and see if that helps; maybe configure has
changed a bit and the cache is messing me up??
                      - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Does "postmaster -i"...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Does "postmaster -i"...