I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build process, so people
who want to hack code will have somewhere to start from.
Rene Pijlman wrote:
> On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote:
>
>>I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 for the
>>postgresql drivers.
>>
>
> Not AFAIK.
>
>
>>It appears that there are some new methods defined
>>in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to just
>>throw the "unimplemented" exception?).
>>
>
> Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they
> implementable?
>
>
>>Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the metadata
>>returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this patch 2 or
>>3 times (to peter@retep) but never heard back. It's only about 4 LOC but
>>it makes introspecting the database much better.
>>
>>Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get a
>>response?
>>
>
> You can send patches to the pgsql-patches@postgresql.org list,
> preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response.
> Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good,
> of course).
>
> If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that
> should be on this list.
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
