Dave Harkness wrote:
> At 12:41 PM 9/5/2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
>> new patch:
>
>
> There still seems to be an error with the same if-block.
>
> ! if (index>=-rows.size())
> ! internalIndex=rows.size()+index;
>
> becomes
>
> ! if (index > -rows_size)
> ! internalIndex = rows_size+index;
>
> Note that the original used >=, not >.
Argh! I need a better screen. :(
>
> Also, why is the first edit being done? Granted it's faster in that it
> doesn't null out the array of rows, but won't that have other effects?
No. Nulling out the array is pointless.
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
