Re: Why JDBC 1? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Barry Lind
Subject Re: Why JDBC 1?
Date
Msg-id 3B950CE2.5050506@xythos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why JDBC 1?  (Rene Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>)
List pgsql-jdbc
One reason is that jdbc2 goes along with Java2.  Thus in the jdbc2 tree
we are allowed to use new methods introduced in jdk1.2.  Whereas in the
jdbc1 tree we are limited to methods available in jdk1.1.

thanks,
--Barry

Rene Pijlman wrote:
> Perhaps this is a silly question, but why do we have separate
> JDBC 1 and 2 drivers?
>
> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Troubles using German Umlauts with JDBC
Next
From: "chris markiewicz"
Date:
Subject: Re: error - NOTICE: current transaction...MORE DETAIL...