Mark wrote:
>
> Is Postgresql ready for 24/7 uptime? Our tests have shown that vacuumdb
> requires downtime, and if one does this nightly as suggested, well, one has
> downtime, 40+ minutes in our case.
>
> My company wants to replace MS SQL Server with PostgreSQL, but we can't
> afford downtime to do database maintenance. Is it possible that we are doing
> something wrong?
>
> What are the plans for future versions of pgsql? Will vacuum be optomized or
> otherwise enhanced to execute more quickly and/or not lock tables?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> PS
> I posted more details to the hackers list.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
Hi
Have you tried creating a duplicating each table then drop the original
and rename
the new one ?
I don't know if that is what you are looking for but dropping a table
and renaming
a table is very quick. The new table should not need to be vacuumed
because all the
tuples are in use.
A quick little script can have this done automatically at an appropriate
time of
the day or night.
I don't have any databases that can't stand a few seconds of down time
around 03:00.
Simple solutions can be more effective than complex solutions {Keep It
Simple Smart}.
Guy Fraser
--
There is a fine line between genius and lunacy, fear not, walk the
line with pride. Not all things will end up as you wanted, but you
will certainly discover things the meek and timid will miss out on.
