Re: Implicit order-by in Postgresql? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: Implicit order-by in Postgresql?
Date
Msg-id 3B26564E.2F7D82CE@tm.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Implicit order-by in Postgresql?  ("earthlink" <NOSPAMnews@tinyvital.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
earthlink wrote:
> 
> Frequently one wants a data set returned in the same order as the
> index used in the query. Informix (at least) has implicit order-by,
> which means that the data will be returned in collating order if the
> query forces use of the appropriate index.
> 
> Does Postgresql do this?

If data is fetched by walking an index, then , yes it produces an 
implicit order. Just don't count on it to stay that way - the use of a 
particular index depends on too many things.

> If not, does an Order-by force a sort even if an index has the correct
> order to satisfy the order-by?

Dropping unneeded sort node from a query tree was one of the earliest 
optimisations in postgresql.

---------------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: AW: Postgres Replication
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] addition of text_inet, text_cidr and inet_set_masklen