Re: pg_index.isclustered can work - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: pg_index.isclustered can work
Date
Msg-id 3B0106C5.A8005959@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_index.isclustered can work  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_index.isclustered can work  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: pg_index.isclustered can work  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

[snip]

> 
> FYI, the reference to pg_index.indisclustered in ODBC was assuming it
> meant it was a hash index,

Hmm where could I see it ?

> which is just plain wrong, so that code is
> not coming back.
> 

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: pg_index.indislossy
Next
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: Re: Internet is putting lot of competition fire & heat under Microsoft SQL Server