AW: pg_index.indislossy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Subject AW: pg_index.indislossy
Date
Msg-id 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633682C7@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
> One problem with keeping it is that interface coders are getting
> confused by some of the unused system table columns, assuming they mean
> something, when in fact they don't.  Both ODBC and JDBC have had this
> problem that I fixed today.

Imho the correct answer to this would be to implement the SQL standard 
system views, and make all interfaces use those.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: pg_index.indislossy
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_index.isclustered can work