Don Baccus wrote:
> The interesting thing to me doesn't simply lie in the debate over this or that feature.
> The interesting thing to me is that more and more requests to ease porting from Oracle
> to Postgres are cropping up.
>
> This says that more and more people from the "real" RDBMS world are starting to take
> Postgres seriously.
Speaking for myself, I think Larry has enough money. The costs of Oracle are
astounding. As I see it, I think Postgres could be the "single server" answer
to the sky high per processor licensing that Oracle has.
A Postgres with enough Oracle-isms would be a world beater. As it is, when I
show Oracle people what Postgres can do, they are blown away. They love the
fact that temporary tables are in an isolated name space, sequences are more
flexible, and a lot of the other neat features.
If we could do:
select * from database.table.field where database.table.field =
localtable.field;
select * from table where field = :var;
and not have to vacuum
Postgres would be incredible. As it is, it is a great database. If it could
have features which make Oracle people comfortable it would be a very serious
alternative to Oracle. Companies like Greatbridge and PostgreSQL inc. would
have a much easier sell.
--
42 was the answer, 49 was too soon.
------------------------
http://www.mohawksoft.com
