"Eric G. Miller" wrote:
> > Ok. First I wanted to use nested tables. But I think it is not
> > possible.
> >
> > Then I decided to create a type that will made the same function, a
> > type that will be like a C structure. This type would contain an
> > integer and a string like (1,'aaa'). Then I would have made a list or
> >
> > an array with this type. Am I clear? Sorry if not, my English is
> > poor.
>
> I think the original question still stands. What are you trying do?
> Can't you map your "structure" to a regular table? A list of struct's
> containing one integer and one string sounds like a table containing
> one integer and one string (with the possible addition of an extra
> key field if the integer is not already an identifier).
>
> CREATE TABLE list_struct (
> i integer NOT NULL,
> c varchar(255) NOT NULL
> CHECK (char_length(c) > 0),
> PRIMARY KEY (i, c)
> );
>
> --
> Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
Of course I can do that but I need one table of that kind for each row of
1000 tables that contain 10000 rows each.
That's the reason why I would have like using nested table.
Olk. I see that I want to do is not possible.
I just want to say that it is a bit disapointing that PostgreSQL that is
qualified OR/DBMS don't offer a way to create nested tables.
I think that will be interresting to add it in future versions.
Renaud THONNART
