Re: replicating many to one - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Doiron, Daniel
Subject Re: replicating many to one
Date
Msg-id 3A8E2AE3D7AFB44F89EA82A873FBE4E655A4F98C@DC-MBOX1.advisory.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: replicating many to one  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: replicating many to one  (Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@gmail.com>)
Re: replicating many to one  (Shuwn Yuan Tee <shuwnyuan@binary.com>)
List pgsql-general
The four source/master servers all have different databases, lets call them A, B, C, and D. We'd like to replicate them
toone cluster that will hold ABCD databases.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 2:46 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] replicating many to one

On 6/4/2015 10:07 AM, Doiron, Daniel wrote:
> I have a situation where I need to replicate the databases in 4 
> clusters on 4 individual servers to a single cluster on 1 server. So 
> far, the best option looks like pgpool statement-based replication, 
> the major down side being sequences. Does anyone know a better way to 
> achieve this type of replication?

do all of your applications have inherent protection against 
collisions?   to use an overly simple example,  if you have an inventory 
table, what happens if two nodes concurrently sell the same last units 
of a given SKU  ?   Or a banking example, whats to prevent concurrent 
transactions on distributed servers handing out the same money ?





--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: replicating many to one
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1