Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Joseph Shraibman
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Date
Msg-id 3A6F5668.3C7443F7@selectacast.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
List pgsql-jdbc
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> No, it cannot be static.
>

Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be
used directly.  It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we
don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them.  But the
performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to
the code, so I don't suggest it.


--
Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net
Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems